|
Post by david on Sept 24, 2006 22:20:27 GMT -5
Give it time..I have to digest what is being fed to me. Oh…just mere constipated pellets of merde. Well you still live up to your nom de derriere! Take your time and don’t strain!
|
|
|
Post by fishfart on Sept 24, 2006 22:47:12 GMT -5
Don't talk with your mouth full.
|
|
|
Post by david on Sept 24, 2006 23:21:31 GMT -5
Don't talk with your mouth full. At least it’s the right end of the alimentary canal
|
|
|
Post by etudes on Sept 25, 2006 0:08:06 GMT -5
david - guy from bible
|
|
|
Post by fishfart on Sept 25, 2006 9:05:43 GMT -5
^don't encourage him!
DaViD, i may be an ass, but at least I don't spout as much sh*t as you. ;D
|
|
|
Post by david on Sept 25, 2006 10:37:35 GMT -5
DaViD, i may be an ass, but at least I don't spout as much sh*t as you. ;D The former is certainly true but I’m sorry but everyone here knows that the latter is not even remotely true A very simple challenge: offer a modicum of evidence to assert your hypothesis
|
|
|
Post by fishfart on Sept 25, 2006 12:34:02 GMT -5
a case of 'denied it supplied it'. ;D First of all, I don't care what your flock of sheep on EAN think. If I did, I would have tact with everyone. Second, no, not everyone here thinks you're a god, sorry. Thirdly, I think you're full of it, no need to prove a damn thing to myself. As for me being an ass, I am not here to impress, befriend, or 'wow' people, I have my own bizarre reasons, and I don't take anything, especially you, seriously on this forum.
|
|
|
Post by david on Sept 25, 2006 13:13:10 GMT -5
a case of 'denied it supplied it'. ;D First of all, I don't care what your flock of sheep on EAN think. If I did, I would have tact with everyone. Second, no, not everyone here thinks you're a god, sorry. Thirdly, I think you're full of it, no need to prove a damn thing to myself. As for me being an ass, I am not here to impress, befriend, or 'wow' people, I have my own bizarre reasons, and I don't take anything, especially you, seriously on this forum. Just as I suspected, you can’t back up your s*** talk. Firstly, an opinion from someone obsessed with me, a multiple IDer and a self-proclaimed ass who can’t back up their talk means exactly that: s***. Secondly, I don’t even know which or whose ass you pulled from when you started babbling about my so called Godship – I never even thought of that once much less expect it or care about it. Thirdly, we all know you can’t prove your s*** talk. As such even judging by your own s*** standards your s*** talk far outweighs anything you consider as me being “full of it”. And why should you care anyway if you don’t take anything seriously on this Forum? How many more times do we need to hear your compulsive need to tell me and everyone that you don’t care about me? Oh yes, the self-proclaimed assness must of course be the sufficient all encompassing convenient explanation for your behaviour.
|
|
|
Post by fishfart on Sept 25, 2006 14:08:59 GMT -5
Just as I suspected, you can’t back up your sh*t talk. Your comprehension is for s***. So, I have to back up my (s***) talk, by proving to YOU that YOU’RE full of s***? I already know, and that’s the only person I will bother convincing. This is what I think you think of yourself. I don't care what your contention is. Let me clarify: Full of it = full of yourself. Well WE all know that I don’t take myself seriously. Show some humility for once, it might just make you mortal. 'Care' doesn’t automatically default to 'seriousness'. If that were true, I would be serious. I care about myself enough to address things that are bulls***. It’s not about you, sweety. If "ass", in your context, equates to gauche, then, uh duh, yes! My behavior screams it. convenient or not. Oh and do try to be less redundant in your reply, I hate listening to the same ol' s***.
|
|
|
Post by david on Sept 25, 2006 14:52:44 GMT -5
Your comprehension is for sh*t. Your comprehension IS s***. So, I have to back up my (sh*t) talk, by proving to YOU that YOU’RE full of sh*t? I already know, and that’s the only person I will bother convincing. s*** talkers can’t back up anything that is why they are full of s*** – that is why the only person who claims to know or who only bother about convincing themselves is precisely full of s***. Your comprehension IS sh*t. This is what I think you think of yourself. I don't care what your contention is. Thanks for telling me how I think or do not think of myself and for repeating to us for the umpteenth time what you think whilst claiming repeatedly not to care. That is why your comprehension IS sh*t. Let me clarify: Full of it = full of yourself. Well WE all know that I don’t take myself seriously. Show some humility for once, it might just make you mortal. Let me clarify: Your s*** >>> your assumption of my ‘full of myself’ There you go again – babbling again about my immortality. You don’t know me or my humility and I’m not here to provide therapy for your self-proclaimed assness. Show some intelligence for once, it might make you more coherent. That is why your comprehension IS sh*t. 'Care' doesn’t automatically default to 'seriousness'. If that were true, I would be serious. I care about myself enough to address things that are bullsh*t. It’s not about you, sweety. If you care enough to address things then it is serious enough for you. That is why your compression IS s***. And if you claim it’s not about me then go and play somewhere else for there are genuine bs***ters out there rather than bother me with your assphorisms, sweety. If "ass", in your context, equates to gauche, then, uh duh, yes! My behavior screams it. convenient or not. Oh and do try to be less redundant in your reply, I hate listening to the same ol' sh*t. Oh, and do try taking your own advice before dishing it out. That is why your comprehension IS sh*t.
|
|
|
Post by fishfart on Sept 25, 2006 15:54:46 GMT -5
Your comprehension is for sh*t. Your comprehension IS sh*t. sh*t talkers can’t back up anything that is why they are full of sh*t – that is why the only person who claims to know or who only bother about convincing themselves is precisely full of sh*t. Your comprehension IS sh*t. yeah yeah, full of s***, I am. I can't argue with what I have been already saying. You're welcome. Most people don't know how they are perceived by others. I thought you might like to know. And I do care when, I myself am concerned in the face of bulls***. otherwise, I don't. Am i not responding to bulls***? I'll answer...yes. Again, it doesn't matter, we're talking about you. we've already established that I am an ass. Do you think anyone here, besides me, thinks you're full of s***, an asshole..a prick, a self assured faux friend of the people? Without a doubt! To assume all people agree with you, infers exactly what you think of yourself. That makes no sense. In that case, everyone here on EAN is serious, otherwise, no one would say anything. I am addressing bulls*** with bulls***, do i care? yes, in the context of myself. I don't have to be coherent to satisfy that FOR myself. out of sight out of mind. and I admit, your persistence is flattering. I never take my own advice, because it's s***.
|
|
|
Post by david on Sept 25, 2006 16:31:12 GMT -5
yeah yeah, full of sh*t, I am. I can't argue with what I have been already saying. Hence if you agree you are full of s***, your opinions are full of s*** so don’t bother arguing what you already claim to can't argue. You're welcome. Most people don't know how they are perceived by others. I thought you might like to know. And I do care when, I myself am concerned in the face of bullsh*t. otherwise, I don't. Am i not responding to bullsh*t? I'll answer...yes. Yes, try telling me something I don’t know Captain Obvious and thank you for letting me know for the umpteenth time from someone who claims not to care...and then claims to care….otherwise you do….otherwise you don’t…oh what was is it you were saying you were concerned about…or not care? Again, it doesn't matter, we're talking about you. we've already established that I am an ass. Do you think anyone here, besides me, thinks you're full of sh*t, an asshole..a prick, a self assured faux friend of the people? Without a doubt! To assume all people agree with you, infers exactly what you think of yourself. If it doesn’t matter then don’t make it matter. Oh so we ARE talking about me are we? Is this before or AFTER you just told me it WASN’T about me? Not only have you conferred the property of “immortality” to me, now I’m apparently a “friend of the people” and that I assume “all people agree with me”…what other colourful monikers and assumptions are going to come flying out of your ass next? That makes no sense. In that case, everyone here on EAN is serious, otherwise, no one would say anything. I am addressing bullsh*t with bullsh*t, do i care? yes, in the context of myself. I don't have to be coherent to satisfy that FOR myself. Of course it doesn’t make sense to you Yes, we know you don’t have to be coherent because it’s already established you are an ass. out of sight out of mind. and I admit, your persistence is flattering. Says the one who magically *poofed* out of the ether not for the first and with a multiple ID account because she can’t drag herself away from the Forum and from the DaViD which is apparently what we are talking about….or not talking about as the case may be….or the BS she HAS to apparently face because she chose to *poof* back into the Forum again to face it….what the hell are you talking about? Oh, it doesn’t have to make any coherent sense because we’ve established you are an ass, full of s***, talk s*** and thus your opinions are s***. I never take my own advice, because it's sh*t. You’ve demonstrated that in words and deeds for the umpteenth time so what’s new?
|
|
|
Post by etudes on Sept 25, 2006 19:54:54 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by david on Sept 25, 2006 20:26:21 GMT -5
To the untrained eye it seems like an argument, but it’s really foreplay for her. (you see, she actually cares very much about me. She wants to change me from an unfeeling God into an emo mortal)She showers mocking condescension on those she secretly admires. The problem is she also showers mocking condescension on those she hates with the fire of a thousand suns. Well…it’s a 50/50 chance
|
|
|
Post by jericho on Sept 26, 2006 1:04:44 GMT -5
Emomortals? Didn't they fight the Decepticons?
|
|