|
Post by long on Feb 7, 2008 0:35:36 GMT -5
pick up some skank at a club for a one-night stand?? It's not quite that simple for mere mortals. You underestimate yourself my good man ANY man can find some woman of at least average attractiveness desperate for some cheap affection if he puts in minimal effort. Nasty business though naturally. the paris hilton thing was a joke btw.
|
|
|
Post by Altan on Feb 7, 2008 0:57:19 GMT -5
Paris hilton just won harvards woman on the year...maybe image is everything after all. God bless america for their upstanding contribution to the narrowing of grotesque stereotypes. I think men who inwardly revile women are spineless freaks deserving of the years of inner solitude that will no doubt consume them. Any reckless generalisations with regards to either sex should only be taken as a joke, at best. Any serious regard paid to such comments only show a mind as infantile as the comment. The best type of men generally have a feminine side and think nothing of it. I think Western men have sort of realised this but they've totally f**ked it up, because it's a mental thing. Wearing a pink shirt and/or eye liner has nothing to do with it. About time...she difinately is what all women around the world want to be..hey where's spellcheck. A cultural icon.
|
|
|
Post by avax on Feb 7, 2008 1:01:02 GMT -5
Any reckless generalisations with regards to either sex should only be taken as a joke, at best. Any serious regard paid to such comments only show a mind as infantile as the comment. Finally. A comment in this entire retarded thread that makes an iota of sense. What I find amusing is that women on the forum seem to enjoy putting themselves above the "average woman" (which by the way, includes 16 year old girls apparently) in a rather bizarre trend leaning towards an attempt at looking less high maintenance or more intelligent. Perhaps this has to do with a serious lack of female leaders in a particular workspace or industry? Is it pessimism? Thankfully I'm surrounded by few but very strong WOMEN. I define them not as generalizations but as specific people I've come to know over some time who are 1) peacekeepers, 2) critical strategists, 3) teachers, 4) supporters, 5) economists, 6) creatives. Working in conjunction with men, who ARE their 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, counterparts, some with greater strengths than others. How stupid the rest of it is. Don't skim the bottom when you can prowl the top. If it's fake, be the best faker. If you're real, be the best realist. f*** the rest.
|
|
|
Post by viruslabrat on Feb 7, 2008 10:00:16 GMT -5
What I find amusing is that women on the forum seem to enjoy putting themselves above the "average woman" (which by the way, includes 16 year old girls apparently) in a rather bizarre trend leaning towards an attempt at looking less high maintenance or more intelligent. I think you just gave your game away.
|
|
|
Post by thekrez on Feb 7, 2008 10:22:01 GMT -5
^ZING
|
|
|
Post by viruslabrat on Feb 7, 2008 16:42:52 GMT -5
Heh heh I was just being cheeky again. ;D I took this thread to be for ranting about stuff that some women do that would make them suck, not for trying to prove that women in general suck. Despite what you say, I'm not trying to put myself above the "average woman" (I don't believe these women I refer to are representative of the "average woman" anyway) and I'm not here to try to make myself look less high maintenance or more intelligent. To insinuate that all the female posters who use this thread to rant about their gripes with other females are doing so with ulterior motives seems, well, just a tad pessimistic perhaps? I mean, you didn't post your opinions and experiences with the aim of looking more intelligent or less high maintenance than the other female posters on this thread, did you?
|
|
|
Post by long on Feb 8, 2008 3:13:32 GMT -5
^ ;D If it's fake, be the best faker. If you're real, be the best realist. f**k the rest. What does this mean? Guys like low-maintenance? - Check, we're cheap and lazy. Guys like intelligent females? - Debatable, we're dumb and lazy.
|
|
|
Post by avax on Feb 8, 2008 10:19:12 GMT -5
It is rather funny that there's more to talk smack about with women rather than men. ;D Gee, I wonder why that is.
|
|
|
Post by viruslabrat on Feb 8, 2008 10:27:01 GMT -5
It's cuz we're more interesting. ;D But now that you mention it... *rushes over to "Men suck" thread*
|
|
|
Post by viruslabrat on Feb 8, 2008 11:19:19 GMT -5
It is rather funny that there's more to talk smack about with women rather than men. ;D Gee, I wonder why that is. Yeah, I wonder
|
|
|
Post by long on Feb 8, 2008 12:01:34 GMT -5
Women are self-absorbed and catty?
|
|
|
Post by thekrez on Feb 8, 2008 19:24:40 GMT -5
No because they really do suck.
|
|
|
Post by viruslabrat on Feb 8, 2008 22:48:23 GMT -5
Women are self-absorbed and catty? I agree with you on the catty part. No because they really do suck. 87 replies to the "Men suck" thread versus 69 replies to the "Women suck" thread prove that men suck MORE. Take that biatch!
|
|
|
Post by TotalWar on Feb 9, 2008 15:51:56 GMT -5
87 replies to the "Men suck" thread versus 69 replies to the "Women suck" thread prove that men suck MORE. Take that biatch! Typical woman logic.
|
|
Mr Brad Pitt
Full Member
Social Retard Spreading Sh.i.t
Posts: 467
|
Post by Mr Brad Pitt on Feb 9, 2008 16:34:15 GMT -5
I'd even say "typical woman biased logic".
|
|