Post by dapper on Jul 2, 2007 12:24:16 GMT -5
It seems like I've talked specifically about this before, and if I have then forgive the rerun and my laziness about checking my history here. But I do find fascinating the debate going on over nanobacteria: Is it alive or isn't it? Does it even matter if it is or isn't? The fact is that nanobacteria or calcified-nano-particles (CNPs) behave in a quasi-life-form way in that they self-replicate above and beyond how crystals do, but maybe short of how bacteria do. In any event, it is becoming more and more accepted in the scientific community that CNPs are present in most instances of calcifying diseases (from kidney stones to heart disease), if not responsible for those conditions. The link below is of a video taken by use of a new high definition Nikon light microscope that demonstrates the difference between CNPs or nanobacteria and mere crystals or calcium deposits. You'll see that when each are treated with a company called Nanobac Pharmaceutical's solution, there is a big difference in how the two breakdown. Crystals or clacium deposits disintegrate and disappear. CNPs or nanobacteria are comprised of a calcified shell that is similiar to crystals or calcium deposits and also disappear, but once they do you observe a strange black, circular particle eject from the center of those shells and continues to wither itself, but not disappear. This particle is what the debate is over. This particle is either a CNP or nanobacteria. This particle is what self-replicates like a lifeform. It is either a life form or it isn't, but whatever it is, it is present in calcifying diseases that affect us all.
home.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/?epi-content=MULTIMEDIA_GALLERY_PUBLIC_VIEW&eid=5265147&newsLang=en
And for a general chronicle of the debate, you can simply hit up wikipedia: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanobacteria
And for more information you can follow the company that's doing the groundwork to uncover and treat the myriad ailments where CNPs or nanobacteria are present and seemingly responsible for the diseased conditions: www.nanobac.com/
So, any thoughts on this?
home.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/?epi-content=MULTIMEDIA_GALLERY_PUBLIC_VIEW&eid=5265147&newsLang=en
And for a general chronicle of the debate, you can simply hit up wikipedia: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanobacteria
And for more information you can follow the company that's doing the groundwork to uncover and treat the myriad ailments where CNPs or nanobacteria are present and seemingly responsible for the diseased conditions: www.nanobac.com/
So, any thoughts on this?
