|
Post by EA Observer on Dec 30, 2007 13:41:11 GMT -5
Probably one big reason why Asian males are emascuated in the West - particularly in North America.
|
|
|
Post by jewbird on Dec 30, 2007 19:40:02 GMT -5
The article speaks to a larger and more systematic problem - namely that a feminized primary education system for both boys and girls undermines masculine virtues in society generally.
|
|
|
Post by ConceptDesign on Dec 30, 2007 22:10:03 GMT -5
Boys and girls are different. Makes sense that imposing femocratic ideals upon them will retard their social and intellectual development. I suppose if their male brains aren't allowed to develop in a male way then of course they'll be little tards, trying to think like females but without the right frame of mind to do it.
|
|
Mr Brad Pitt
Full Member
Social Retard Spreading Sh.i.t
Posts: 467
|
Post by Mr Brad Pitt on Dec 30, 2007 22:17:00 GMT -5
Boys and girls are born equal. They've just always been formatted by the society.
|
|
|
Post by fumanchu on Dec 31, 2007 2:01:06 GMT -5
nope, seems that there are differences in the way boys n girls brains work, right from the get go.
|
|
|
Post by black mamba on Dec 31, 2007 3:14:30 GMT -5
I don't know if emasculation is really the problem-- it's more an issue of physical repression that's (probably) leading boys (who are naturally rowdy, for the most part) to become restless in a classroom setting and taking their focus away from learning. Simple.
I don't quite see the logic behind Boys + Toy Guns = SMRT.
|
|
Mr Brad Pitt
Full Member
Social Retard Spreading Sh.i.t
Posts: 467
|
Post by Mr Brad Pitt on Dec 31, 2007 11:14:07 GMT -5
nope, seems that there are differences in the way boys n girls brains work, right from the get go. Right. I've chosen the wrong term. Boys and girls are born sociologically equal.
|
|
|
Post by jewbird on Dec 31, 2007 17:15:20 GMT -5
I don't know if emasculation is really the problem-- it's more an issue of physical repression that's (probably) leading boys (who are naturally rowdy, for the most part) to become restless in a classroom setting and taking their focus away from learning. Simple. I don't quite see the logic behind Boys + Toy Guns = SMRT. It's not that simple. Even the very nature of the educational system as a passive mechanism is repressive to masculine nature. Allowing boys to play with guns encourages them to socialize in an appropriate manner and develop important life skills that may one day be all that stands between society and its destruction.
|
|
|
Post by ConceptDesign on Jan 1, 2008 18:53:48 GMT -5
I don't quite see the logic behind Boys + Toy Guns = SMRT. That's because you're a chick.
|
|
|
Post by halfbreed on Jan 2, 2008 1:51:30 GMT -5
^ Didn't you used to be?
|
|
|
Post by black mamba on Jan 2, 2008 2:16:21 GMT -5
I don't quite see the logic behind Boys + Toy Guns = SMRT. That's because you're a chick. I don't quite see the logic behind Girls + E-Z Bake Oven = SMRT, either. Your point?
|
|
|
Post by ConceptDesign on Jan 2, 2008 3:32:15 GMT -5
Its because you're a chick.
|
|
|
Post by TotalWar on Jan 3, 2008 22:12:48 GMT -5
I don't quite see the logic behind Boys + Toy Guns = SMRT. It's very simple: They who'd forge their swords to plow-shares. Shall sweat in bitter yokes. The free-born race and fearless Must deal out battle strokes.
|
|
|
Post by jewbird on Jan 12, 2008 19:56:10 GMT -5
That's because you're a chick. I don't quite see the logic behind Girls + E-Z Bake Oven = SMRT, either. Your point? Parents get toys like that for their daughters to encourage the development of appropriate gender role behavior, as a woman who enjoys baking will make a good wife and mother, which for non-whores is the ultimate archetypical expression of women's role in society. @ Totalwar: that's a beautiful poem man.
|
|