|
Post by elle on Dec 4, 2007 15:23:56 GMT -5
- If by spoken for you mean married then I get what you're saying. People are pretty much 'out there' until you tie them down as far as I can tell. I think planning to get married also qualifies. But females who make no time to even seriously date men who are marriage material because they're too busy whoring around definitely qualify as cheap, worthless whores. Did you ever stop to think you are simply chasing the wrong girls? From the level of bitterness displayed of late, I'd say you've been duped again. Your fault.
|
|
|
Post by long on Dec 4, 2007 15:45:01 GMT -5
- If by spoken for you mean married then I get what you're saying. People are pretty much 'out there' until you tie them down as far as I can tell. I think planning to get married also qualifies. But females who make no time to even seriously date men who are marriage material because they're too busy whoring around definitely qualify as cheap, worthless whores. - I'll agree with your first sentence. Regarding the latter: while I agree that committed love is the ultimate, I cannot agree that the pursuit of casual love is solely the province of the utterly depraved.. it can be kinda nice in its own right. Not every girl can be fortunate enough to meet a perfect gentleman like yourself..
|
|
|
Post by elle on Dec 4, 2007 16:04:21 GMT -5
I think planning to get married also qualifies. But females who make no time to even seriously date men who are marriage material because they're too busy whoring around definitely qualify as cheap, worthless whores. - I'll agree with your first sentence. Regarding the latter: while I agree that committed love is the ultimate, I cannot agree that the pursuit of casual love is solely the province of the utterly depraved.. it can be kinda nice in its own right. Not every girl can be fortunate enough to meet a perfect gentleman like yourself.. There is significant evidence indicating that males are much more interested in short-term mating strategies than females, and as such are more likely to deceive women than vice versa. eg. they are more likely to feign interest in a long-term relationship. I am sure no man on this board has committed such a heinous error. Sam will personally strike you down, so as to protect the sanctity of marriage for both sexes. Well, I'd just like to thank you Sam, for making it crystal clear to everybody you're an absolute mysogynistic nutter ranting about views we all thought were merely behind us. (Several decades ago). You can be the next Rush Limbaugh. nb. sorry this is not a reply to long...as is probably obvious.
|
|
|
Post by jewbird on Dec 4, 2007 20:32:04 GMT -5
[ Did you ever stop to think you are simply chasing the wrong girls? I have, but overcoming that s*** is like overcoming gravity.
|
|
|
Post by jewbird on Dec 4, 2007 20:33:52 GMT -5
I think planning to get married also qualifies. But females who make no time to even seriously date men who are marriage material because they're too busy whoring around definitely qualify as cheap, worthless whores. - I'll agree with your first sentence. Regarding the latter: while I agree that committed love is the ultimate, I cannot agree that the pursuit of casual love is solely the province of the utterly depraved.. it can be kinda nice in its own right. Not every girl can be fortunate enough to meet a perfect gentleman like yourself.. Yeah, but supposing they do but then they continue to go out?
|
|
|
Post by jewbird on Dec 4, 2007 20:42:27 GMT -5
- I'll agree with your first sentence. Regarding the latter: while I agree that committed love is the ultimate, I cannot agree that the pursuit of casual love is solely the province of the utterly depraved.. it can be kinda nice in its own right. Not every girl can be fortunate enough to meet a perfect gentleman like yourself.. There is significant evidence indicating that males are much more interested in short-term mating strategies than females, and as such are more likely to deceive women than vice versa. eg. they are more likely to feign interest in a long-term relationship. Did any of that "significant evidence" indicate anything about females who pursue short-term / multiple-partner mating strategies? In my defense, some of us were never interested in a long-term relationship with a girl who, to us, was just a bar pick-up, but were daily subjected to communist brainwashing propaganda until we were willing to say anything to avoid an argument. "Us?" You mean other victims of Illuminist brainwashing propaganda designed to depopulate the world?
|
|
cm
Junior Member
Posts: 68
|
Post by cm on Dec 4, 2007 22:47:43 GMT -5
HESH WANTS SEX!
-Hesh, from Sealab 2021
|
|
|
Post by viruslabrat on Dec 4, 2007 23:11:37 GMT -5
Jewbird sounds like he has a chip on his shoulder from being rejected one too many times. what about the EAs that never will be because our hottest women are more interested in having careers with a long-term value of zero and random hook-ups on the circuit party scene than being with the love of their lives? If you were the love of someone's life they wouldn't choose their career or random hook-ups over you. It's just another version of the "It's not you, it's me" excuse some women use when breaking up or rejecting a potential date. Unfortunately it can hide the real issue at hand, for example the guy could be a misogynistic loser that no sane woman would touch with a 10 foot pole. If you're constantly being turned down by women who say they'd rather see other people then take that as a hint. The common factor in these situations is you!
|
|
|
Post by viruslabrat on Dec 4, 2007 23:15:11 GMT -5
"Us?" You mean other victims of Illuminist brainwashing propaganda designed to depopulate the world? Yeah, women were only put on this planet to breed. Women who don't want children, what madness! What will they want next? The right to vote?! Dear God!
|
|
|
Post by jewbird on Dec 5, 2007 1:54:01 GMT -5
Jewbird sounds like he has a chip on his shoulder from being rejected one too many times. what about the EAs that never will be because our hottest women are more interested in having careers with a long-term value of zero and random hook-ups on the circuit party scene than being with the love of their lives? If you were the love of someone's life they wouldn't choose their career or random hook-ups over you. It's just another version of the "It's not you, it's me" excuse some women use when breaking up or rejecting a potential date. Unfortunately it can hide the real issue at hand, for example the guy could be a misogynistic loser that no sane woman would touch with a 10 foot pole. If you're constantly being turned down by women who say they'd rather see other people then take that as a hint. The common factor in these situations is you! No, the common factor in these situations is HER. Every girl I know likes me. Even that one. But most girls at least have the decency to at least try to pretend like they aren't sleeping around. The losers are the cheap whores who think being public toilets makes them "empowered."
|
|
|
Post by jewbird on Dec 5, 2007 1:56:35 GMT -5
"Us?" You mean other victims of Illuminist brainwashing propaganda designed to depopulate the world? Yeah, women were only put on this planet to breed. Women who don't want children, what madness! What will they want next? The right to vote?! Dear God! Maybe they'll want to just go out to clubs, do lines of coke with random sleazebags and then get passed around like baggies of coke. Paris Hilton is the most "empowered" woman in the world.
|
|
|
Post by jewbird on Dec 5, 2007 1:57:46 GMT -5
Let's get one thing straight: only married women are "empowered." The rest only empower the men who get to use them for their own purposes.
|
|
|
Post by long on Dec 5, 2007 3:25:58 GMT -5
Let's get one thing straight: only married women are "empowered." The rest only empower the men who get to use them for their own purposes. Sorry, but this is hopelessly sexist.
|
|
|
Post by jewbird on Dec 5, 2007 4:44:02 GMT -5
Alright, only married women and whores are empowered. Whores make their own money and don't depend on anyone else.
|
|
|
Post by viruslabrat on Dec 5, 2007 6:01:45 GMT -5
Jewbird sounds like he has a chip on his shoulder from being rejected one too many times. If you were the love of someone's life they wouldn't choose their career or random hook-ups over you. It's just another version of the "It's not you, it's me" excuse some women use when breaking up or rejecting a potential date. Unfortunately it can hide the real issue at hand, for example the guy could be a misogynistic loser that no sane woman would touch with a 10 foot pole. If you're constantly being turned down by women who say they'd rather see other people then take that as a hint. The common factor in these situations is you! No, the common factor in these situations is HER. Every girl I know likes me. Even that one. But most girls at least have the decency to at least try to pretend like they aren't sleeping around. The losers are the cheap whores who think being public toilets makes them "empowered." So, you're hung up over one girl who refuses to seriously date you and would rather see other men. Get over her. She doesn't love and I doubt she even likes you. I know for certain that if any of the girls you know (what 2?) read your posts on this forum NONE of them would like you. Why would you rather she pretend she's not sleeping around? If she's throwing that behaviour in your face it's obvious she's telling you she's not interested.
|
|