|
Post by daisypukes on Dec 26, 2007 3:11:52 GMT -5
What body type do you find attractive on the opposite/same sex?
I like thin guys. Lean, not too much muscle and no fat. I'm the opposite when it comes to girls though. Thin girls can be pretty, but I prefer a more curvy figure on girls.
Anyway, you?
|
|
|
Post by black mamba on Dec 26, 2007 3:25:59 GMT -5
I prefer guys who are fit, tall, and proportionate.
I also think girls are sassier if they're curvy, but don't mind slim girls, as long as they're not stick-thin and running around begging for attention by declaring how "fat" they are in the middle of a large crowd. Pimpslap.
|
|
|
Post by daisypukes on Dec 26, 2007 6:34:37 GMT -5
^I don't like tall guys either. I look at a tall guy and get freaked out. They're like giant freaks of nature.
|
|
|
Post by ChickenSoda on Dec 26, 2007 6:56:37 GMT -5
I like a girl with a little(not a lot) something to hold onto. I like to look at firm bodies, though. I guess it would be perfect if a girl could have perfect abs that feel chubby to the touch. Makes me think of that potbelly conversation from Pulp Fiction.
Anyway, in reality, I don't care so much about a girl's body type, so long as she has a pretty face and she's not fat. What's fat? That's all in the boobs to stomach ratio.
I also tend to go out with short girls. I guess it's just pretty convenient when your girl can also double as a projectile.
|
|
|
Post by Ajeno on Dec 26, 2007 8:30:21 GMT -5
Pretty face and thick in the waist, but not too thick.
|
|
|
Post by avax on Dec 26, 2007 19:57:27 GMT -5
I like seksi type. The type I can roll around in mama's rice and eat drunken chicken off of.
|
|
|
Post by JohnCoolYoungHistory on Dec 27, 2007 1:55:07 GMT -5
I love slim girls who I can break in half, as long as they have a little something to show when the bra comes off. Too skinny is a no-no and quite boyish.
I also find a little bit of baby fat, as long as its proportionate, to be completely sexy if everything works in harmony.
Ideally, I love very fit, curvy and FIRM bodies (this does not mean a six-pack). Most amazing body I ever felt was on a drop-dead gorgeous 18 year old stripper who I got to feel up last time I was at the strip club. GOD DAAAAAYUUUM.
But, I'm a realist and not an idealist.
|
|
|
Post by halfbreed on Dec 27, 2007 11:38:31 GMT -5
Fat or skinny fat don't do anything for me. What's ' skinny fat'? Chubby?
|
|
|
Post by Ajeno on Dec 27, 2007 14:08:00 GMT -5
I like seksi type. The type I can roll around in mama's rice and eat drunken chicken off of. I dig your style.
|
|
tbw
Full Member
Posts: 332
|
Post by tbw on Dec 27, 2007 16:39:44 GMT -5
I love a girl who is into playing sports. So the body type that comes from playing sports for a while is what I like. Lean yet not skinny (Guess this is just like almost all the other guys here!)
|
|
cm
Junior Member
Posts: 68
|
Post by cm on Dec 27, 2007 18:17:41 GMT -5
This type of body. Athletic, but not to the pint where it's manly.
|
|
|
Post by SecretAsianMan on Dec 27, 2007 19:20:54 GMT -5
^Question: At what point should a woman stop exercising with weights and consuming protein to avoid becoming "manly?"
Does everyone here agree that there is a particular level of muscularity at which a lady is no longer aesthetically "feminine," regardless of male hormone-related issues (i.e., even if she isn't upsetting her hormonal levels through anabolic steroid use...)? Is this concept even logical?
Does artist Boris Vallejo, for example, cross this line in his artwork?
Just wondering... I can imagine that in many conservative societies around the world today, that lady's physique would already be considered unattractive by the majority.
|
|
|
Post by hapalicious on Dec 27, 2007 19:54:16 GMT -5
SAM, i think it s rather obvious that there s a certain point of muscularity women shouldn t reach to become manly and drawing the line is impossible to do as it all depends on the person. weightlifters might consider those overly muscular women as just "toned" when we ll think they re freaks of nature. on average though, for the norm, i think one can easily tell when a woman is too muscular though. This type of body. Athletic, but not to the pint where it's manly. ^though i do agree that she has a killer body and i d rather have her body than mine, i don t find her "feminine" enough... i think her shoulder/ass ratio isn t what i d consider the perfect body. if her legs weren t spread out, sure she d have a tight round and bubbly butt but her shoulders might still be too broad for my taste...at least compared to how "small" her ass is. i don t think she has that good a set of "feminine" hips. but that s just me. then again, she has a killer body i d gladly switch for mine but it s not what i d consider to be perfection... also...everyone s giving their ideal type... slender and toned...not too thin, not too fat. can anyone give a more realistic opinion ? of course i d go for the toned/not flabby/not too muscular ideal set here, but if not for that, i d probably rather have someone on the chubby side than on the overly/sickly thin side. and if chubby, i d rather "thicker" than flabby. thin is ok/good, too thin is a no no for a guy.
|
|
cm
Junior Member
Posts: 68
|
Post by cm on Dec 27, 2007 21:49:24 GMT -5
SAM, i think it s rather obvious that there s a certain point of muscularity women shouldn t reach to become manly and drawing the line is impossible to do as it all depends on the person. weightlifters might consider those overly muscular women as just "toned" when we ll think they re freaks of nature. on average though, for the norm, i think one can easily tell when a woman is too muscular though. This type of body. Athletic, but not to the pint where it's manly. ^though i do agree that she has a killer body and i d rather have her body than mine, i don t find her "feminine" enough... i think her shoulder/ass ratio isn t what i d consider the perfect body. if her legs weren t spread out, sure she d have a tight round and bubbly butt but her shoulders might still be too broad for my taste...at least compared to how "small" her ass is. i don t think she has that good a set of "feminine" hips. but that s just me. then again, she has a killer body i d gladly switch for mine but it s not what i d consider to be perfection... also...everyone s giving their ideal type... slender and toned...not too thin, not too fat. can anyone give a more realistic opinion ? of course i d go for the toned/not flabby/not too muscular ideal set here, but if not for that, i d probably rather have someone on the chubby side than on the overly/sickly thin side. and if chubby, i d rather "thicker" than flabby. thin is ok/good, too thin is a no no for a guy. She had me with those thighs. Beyonce has some nice ones too. I also like women with that look because it shows they workout and take care of their body, and have a type of work ethic similar to mine, which is attractive to me. Of course when they are too buff, that goes overboard. Don't worry Marie, most of us are bulls***ting and aren't that picky Realistically men are probably less picky than women!
|
|
|
Post by dannyd on Dec 27, 2007 22:02:23 GMT -5
SAM, i think it s rather obvious that there s a certain point of muscularity women shouldn t reach to become manly and drawing the line is impossible to do as it all depends on the person. weightlifters might consider those overly muscular women as just "toned" when we ll think they re freaks of nature. on average though, for the norm, i think one can easily tell when a woman is too muscular though. This type of body. Athletic, but not to the pint where it's manly. ^though i do agree that she has a killer body and i d rather have her body than mine, i don t find her "feminine" enough... i think her shoulder/ass ratio isn t what i d consider the perfect body. if her legs weren t spread out, sure she d have a tight round and bubbly butt but her shoulders might still be too broad for my taste...at least compared to how "small" her ass is. i don t think she has that good a set of "feminine" hips. but that s just me. then again, she has a killer body i d gladly switch for mine but it s not what i d consider to be perfection... also...everyone s giving their ideal type... slender and toned...not too thin, not too fat. can anyone give a more realistic opinion ? of course i d go for the toned/not flabby/not too muscular ideal set here, but if not for that, i d probably rather have someone on the chubby side than on the overly/sickly thin side. and if chubby, i d rather "thicker" than flabby. thin is ok/good, too thin is a no no for a guy. I don't know quite how to explain this. I would agree she has a killer body. But she has a killer body in a magazine type way as opposed to my true personal preference type way. As in this is the sort of body that I've been subconsciously led to believe is ideal in magazines like inside sport etc and if you were to ask me to choose an athletic model for an athletic shoot I'd choose her. Take women like Cindy Crawford, Elle McPherson they look great on the catwalk, but again not the type of body I'm dropping my jaw at in the streets. My comment would more likely be like 'wow, look at her, that's model material'. I'm much more attracted to a couple of extra pounds, curves, softness. I'm not talking 'breasts and booty' but a certain ratio of thighs to arse/hips to shoulders. hmm, I'm doing a poor job a articulating my feelings. But I see the picture above and thinks, yes, she's hot, but not from a 'desire' type point of view. Allow me to be disgustingly soppy for one moment. Since I don't have to look you all in the eye I think I can manage. In my experience, to a certain extent, my most desired body belongs to the person whom I desire
|
|