Post by juancarlos on Nov 13, 2007 3:20:12 GMT -5
Zoff,
Frankly, I don't understand how we've gotten into this discussion. All I was saying initially was that if you have prison rape as a legal punishment instituted by the government and carried out by prison guards, it may have the consequence of attracting the wrong persons to work as prison guards.
Your point essentially is that the character of the prison guards does not matter so long as they perform their jobs according to the letter of the law. My point is that character really matters, especially that you affirmed that you can't really police thoughts, and that you yourself would prefer not to hire someone who may have tendencies to criminal behavior (even if they're just via verbalized ideas that are not yet acted upon). Yes, character may not matter, if you were in an ideal world.
Again, both the theory and practice of your "an eye for an eye" justice are capricious, tenuous, offensive to majority of society, and extremely impossible to implement justly and smoothly. Gosh, I have other million questions to ask, such as:
1. How do you quantify pain to ensure that the penalty exacted equals the crime committed?
2. What do you do when the punishment exceeds the crime? Punish the punisher?
3. Again, how does one rape "professionally"? Rape itself is not just a physical act, but it carries psychological and emotional ramifications as well. Have you not considered that whoever is doing the mandatory raping might get addicted to it and try to exact this punishment on others when it is not due?
4. This of course will require a more intensive policing of prisons to ensure that the punishment indeed does not exceed the crime committed. Where will you get the resources to do this?
JC
P.S. Pls. explain the relevance of the Mother Teresa question and I'll be pleased to answer questions on her.
Frankly, I don't understand how we've gotten into this discussion. All I was saying initially was that if you have prison rape as a legal punishment instituted by the government and carried out by prison guards, it may have the consequence of attracting the wrong persons to work as prison guards.
Your point essentially is that the character of the prison guards does not matter so long as they perform their jobs according to the letter of the law. My point is that character really matters, especially that you affirmed that you can't really police thoughts, and that you yourself would prefer not to hire someone who may have tendencies to criminal behavior (even if they're just via verbalized ideas that are not yet acted upon). Yes, character may not matter, if you were in an ideal world.
Again, both the theory and practice of your "an eye for an eye" justice are capricious, tenuous, offensive to majority of society, and extremely impossible to implement justly and smoothly. Gosh, I have other million questions to ask, such as:
1. How do you quantify pain to ensure that the penalty exacted equals the crime committed?
2. What do you do when the punishment exceeds the crime? Punish the punisher?
3. Again, how does one rape "professionally"? Rape itself is not just a physical act, but it carries psychological and emotional ramifications as well. Have you not considered that whoever is doing the mandatory raping might get addicted to it and try to exact this punishment on others when it is not due?
4. This of course will require a more intensive policing of prisons to ensure that the punishment indeed does not exceed the crime committed. Where will you get the resources to do this?
JC
P.S. Pls. explain the relevance of the Mother Teresa question and I'll be pleased to answer questions on her.